Instructions

Define the Problem/Observation: Brand A batteries versus Brand B batteries. Select one: O a.4. Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. O 6.3 – Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. c.2. Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. d. 1 – Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors. Propose Solutions/ Hypothesis: Which batteries last longer: Brand A or Brand B? Select one: O a. 4Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as all of the following ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem 6.3. Proposes one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicate comprehension of the problem. Solutions/hypotheses are sensitive to contextual factors as well as the one of the following ethical, logical, or cultural dimensions of the problems C2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is off the shelt” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem or cultural dimensions of the problems. c.2 – Proposes one solution/hypothesis that is off the shelf” rather that individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem. O d. 1 – Proposes a solution/hypothesis that is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or only indirectly addresses the problem statement Evaluate Potential Solutions/Prediction: The Brand A batteries will last longer because they are name brand. Select one: 0.4 – Evaluation of solutions is deep and elegant (for example, contains thorough and insightful explanation) and includes, deeply and thoroughly, all of the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution b. 3 – Evaluation of solutions is adequate (for example, contains thorough explanation) and includes the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning. O c. 2 – Evaluation of solutions is brief (for example, explanation lacks depth) and includes the following considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution d. 1 – Evaluation of solutions is superficial (for example, contains cursory, surface level explanation) and includes the following, considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution Identify Strategies/Set up Experiment Test 1: Take a flash light put Brand A batteries in and turn on flash light Keep flashlight on you at all times and watch for the light to go out. Record the time. Test 2: Take same flashlight and insert Brand B batteries. Start timer. When flashlight stops working, record the time. tion Select one: O a 4 Implements the solution in a manner that addresses thoroughly and deeply multiple contextual factors of the problem 6.3 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors of the problem in a surface manner O c. 2 – Implements the solution in a manner that addresses the problem statement but ignores relevant contextual factors O d. 1 – Implements the solution in a manner that does not directly address the problem statement

Order with us today for a quality custom paper on the above topic or any other topic!

What Awaits you:

• High Quality custom-written papers

• Automatic plagiarism check

• On-time delivery guarantee

• Masters and PhD-level writers

• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality